The Midwest Center for Justice

    “Twenty years have passed since this Court declared that the death penalty must be imposed fairly, and with reasonable consistency, or not at all, . . . and, despite the effort of the States and courts to devise legal formulas and procedural rules to meet this daunting challenge, the death penalty remains fraught with arbitrariness, discrimination, caprice, and mistake.”

    --Justice Harry Blackmun, dissenting in Callins v. Collins

About Us Summer Clerk Program Our Cases Contact

    LIST OF SUCCESSFUL DEATH PENALTY CASES THAT SUMMER AND ACADEMIC YEAR LAW CLERKS MEANINGFULLY ASSISTED WITH RESEARCH, WRITING, EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND ORAL ARGUMENT

    Obviously, over the years, law students have assisted with both successful and unsuccessful cases. Below are listed some successful procedural and merits-based cases that demonstrate that the efforts of law students make a difference in this difficult area of the law.

    Lambert v. Davis, No. 5-2610:

    In the summer of 2005, student interns assisted in Lambert v. Davis, No. 5-2610, with research to obtain a stay of execution in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit a few days before an execution scheduled to occur June 21, 2005. On June 17th, the Seventh Circuit issued an Order granting a temporary stay of execution in order to evaluate Lambert's certificate of appealability.

    The students also assisted in research for Lambert's brief in the United States Supreme Court, in opposition to the state's attempt to lift the stay on June 21, 2005. The United States Supreme Court denied the state's motion. Davis v. Lambert, No. 04A1060 (U.S. Supreme Court June 21, 2005 Order denying application to vacate stay of execution).

    On July 11, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals granted Lambert's certificate of appealability. The students assisted in the research of the emergency cross-appeal brief in the Seventh Circuit, and observed the oral argument on October 26, 2005. The case is still pending in the Seventh Circuit.

    Bradshaw v. Stumpf, 125 S. Ct. 2398 (2005):

    During the 2004-2005 winter and spring, students assisted with the research and editing of the merits brief in the United States Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court had granted certiorari in Stumpf v. Mitchell, 04-637, on January 7, 2005. This followed the success in Stumpf v. Mitchell, 367 F.3d 594 (6th Cir. 2004), where the Sixth Circuit had remanded for a new trial in the Ohio state court. Students had previously assisted with the research in the Sixth Circuit. In addition to helping research and edit the merits brief in the Supreme Court, students also attended the April 19, 2005 oral argument in the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court on June 13, 2005, reversed in part and remanded to the Sixth Circuit to clarify its opinions on the sentencing claims. Bradshaw v. Stumpf, 125 S. Ct. 2398 (2005).

    In previous summers and academic years, law students were involved in the following death penalty cases:

    People v. West, 187 Ill.2d 418 (1999) Students assisted in researching the appellate briefs, and attended oral argument in the Illinois Supreme Court. West was found not eligible for the death penalty;

    People v. Edgeston, No. 90 CF 358 (Rockford, Illinois state trial court). Students assisted in research which resulted in reaching a settlement for a sentence less than death;

    Rastafari v. State, No. 45S00-0210-SD-510, unpublished order (Ind. Feb. 5, 2003) Students assisted in an evidentiary hearing and post-trial memorandum on issue of mental retardation. The trial court found the defendant not eligible for the death penalty because he was mentally retarded;

    Smith v. State, 877 So. 2d 369 (Miss. 2004). Students assisted in the appeal to the Mississippi Supreme Court, which ultimately remanded for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether the defendant is mentally retarded;

    Burris v. Parke, 95 F.3d 465 (7th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Students assisted with researching substantial issues and attended two arguments before the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, both of which were en banc. The Seventh Circuit remanded to district court for a hearing on the merits;

    Mahaffey v. Page, 162 F.3d 481 (7th Cir. 1998). Students assisted with research and attended oral argument in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The Seventh Circuit remanded to the state court for a Batson hearing;

    Matheney v. Anderson, 253 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2001). Students assisted with research and attended oral argument in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The Seventh Circuit remanded for a fitness hearing in the district court;

    Wright v. Cowan, 149 F.Supp. 2d 523 (C.D. Ill. 2001); Wright v. Walls, 288 F.3d 937 (7th Cir. 2002). Students assisted with research and attended oral argument in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The Seventh Circuit remanded for a new sentencing hearing. Wright v. Walls, 292 F.3d 933 (7th Cir. 2002) (denying rehearing en banc);

    Roche v. Davis, 291 F.3d 473 (7th Cir. 2002). Students assisted with research and attended oral argument in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The Seventh Circuit remanded for a new sentencing hearing;

    Matthews v. Parker, No. 01-6527. Students assisted with research and attended oral argument in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. On October 24, 2003, the Sixth Circuit remanded to the Kentucky district court for a hearing on the merits;

    Samra v. State, No. CC-97-384.60 (Circuit Court of Shelby County, Alabama), students assisted in research and attended oral argument in Alabama. Ultimately, Samra was granted an evidentiary hearing on ineffective assistance of counsel in 2003.